Goodwill workers accused in scam
Two Mid-Mon Valley men will face trial in Westmoreland County Court after police said they stole nearly $4,000 worth of merchandise while working at the Goodwill store in Rostraver Township before selling the items online.
James M. Silsley, 61, of 595 Mt. Etna Road, Smithton, and Chris Bartolotta, 31, of 708 Fallowfield Ave., Charleroi, each face single felony counts of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and criminal conspiracy.
Both waived their rights to preliminary hearings Monday before Magisterial District Judge Charles Christner in West Newton.
Rostraver police said they received a call Nov. 7 from a loss prevention officer at the store, located at 140 Finley Road. The store allegedly had video footage of Bartolotta and Silsley concealing items they thought had resale value.
Police said Silsley provided a written statement on Nov. 12 admitting he took the merchandise from June 2012 to November 2013 and sold them on eBay.
The merchandise would be previously stashed away by him and Bartolotta, Silsley stated.
The pair would split the money, but Silsley allegedly told police he wanted 60 percent of the profits because he was taking the bigger chance by physically removing items from the store. Police estimate the total value of the items at $3,792.
Both men were released on their own recognizance.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.