Monessen School Board seeks wireless network control
The Monessen School Board is expected to vote next week on a measure aimed at blocking students from accessing the district's wireless Internet network.
At an informational meeting Tuesday, the board discussed entering into an agreement with Dagostino Electronic Service of Pittsburgh to provide a wireless solution utilizing Virtual Controller technology.
“Students have the ability to access our wireless system just by downloading an app on their phone,” acting Superintendent Dr. Leanne Spazak said. “This will prevent the use of cell phones on our district wireless system.”
Spazak said the measure is a preventative step, adding and that there haven't been any problems with – or breaches of – the district system.
“The biggest thing is that we can tell by looking at the servers that there are a lot more people on the wireless,” Spazak said. “This will prevent anything from happening.”
The contract is contingent on the district obtaining approval of Priority 2 E-Rate money through the federal government. The original cost would be approximately $60,000, but the priority funds will provide an 80 percent discount and cut the cost to just over $12,000.
Spazak said it could be a while before the district learns if it will receive the money, but can lock in the reduced rate if it enters into the contract now.
“Hopefully we get the funding,” she said.
The board is also expected to vote on a service agreement with DES to maintain data infrastructure for the district. The deal would cost $7,452 for the period 2014 through 2017 and would be billed in annual payments of $2,484.
Spazak said DES installed much of the district's data infrastructure and is familiar with the system.
Jeremy Sellew is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-684-2667.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.