Ellsworth standoff suspect arraigned
An Ellsworth man who allegedly forced his way into an ex-girlfriend's home and caused a nearly 19-hour standoff with police was sent to jail Sunday after he was treated and released from the hospital.
Joe Carl Cunningham, 28, was arraigned at 12:15 p.m. Sunday before Magisterial District Judge James Ellis and remanded to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $250,000 straight cash bond.
He was charged with single counts of burglary and criminal mischief and two counts each of aggravated assault, unlawful restraint, terroristic threats, simple assault and reckless endangerment.
Cunningham is accused of entering the Oak Street home of his ex-girlfriend 4 p.m. Friday and exchanging gunfire with the woman's current live-in boyfriend. State police said Cunningham suffered a gunshot wound to his upper arm that was not life-threatening.
Cunningham's ex-girlfriend and current boyfriend, whom state police did not indentify, purportedly escaped the house Friday and called 911. A 15-year-old girl that remained in the home was able to escape at some point overnight, police said.
Cunningham remained inside, keeping police and SWAT team members at bay, before finally surrendering peacefully around 11 a.m. Saturday.
He was taken to Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh for treatment.
Cunningham's preliminary hearing is scheduled for 1 p.m. Feb. 28 before Magisterial District Judge Curtis Thompson of Bentleyville.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.