Mon City chief issues scam warning
Monongahela police are warning residents about a telephone scammer posing as a city police officer.
Police Chief Brian Tempest said Carroll Township police notified him Friday after a township woman received a call from the scam artist Friday evening.
The caller ID read: “Monongahela Police” and contained a 724 area code number.
“The female caller identified herself as one of our police officers, using the proper name of one of our officers,” Tempest said. “She spoke with a Middle Eastern accent. She told the resident that she would be placed under arrest if she did not return the call to a certain phone number within 45 minutes.”
Tempest indicated the caller said the police would come to the woman's house to make the arrest.
“The scam victim raised all of the logical questions: who, what, why?” Tempest said. “She kept asking proper questions to the point that the scammer got frustrated and hung up on her.”
Tempest said it was unusual that the scammer was able to use a telephone connection that came up on the potential victim's phone ID as a police number.
The chief said he is aware of one scam in which victims are persuaded to call a specific number.
The victim is charged $30 for the initial hook-up and more for every additional minute.
“We want to let the public know the police won't call you and tell you to call another number within 45 minutes,” Tempest explained.
“Another red flag was that she had a Middle Eastern accent.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.