Man arrested for North Belle Vernon assault
A homeless man accused of wielding a box cutter while tussling with two North Belle Vernon men earlier this month was arrested and sent to jail Monday.
North Belle Vernon police said that on March 4, Anthony David Gillingham, 26, broke into a secure apartment building at 523 Broad Ave. and tried pushing his way into an apartment belonging to Kinyarde Franklin.
The two scuffled until Gene Guidry came out in the hallway with a baseball bat because he knows Gillingham to be a dangerous person and possibly carry weapons, according to police.
When Franklin took the bat from Guidry, Gillingham allegedly took a box cutter out of his pocket, held it within an inch of Guidry's throat and told Franklin, “I could kill this dude, but I am not going to because I like him,” according to police.
Police said Guidry grabbed the box cutter and received a small cut on his hands. Gillingham then ran down the steps and out the back door. Franklin and Guidry both told police that Gillingham smelled of alcohol and several other witnesses stated they saw the incident and would be willing to testify against Gillingham, police said.
Police arrested Gillingham on Monday at the Budget Inn motel in Rostraver Township on the following charges: burglary, aggravated assault, criminal trespass, terroristic threats, four counts of simple assault, two counts of reckless endangerment, two counts of disorderly conduct, two counts of harassment and one count of public drunkenness.
Gillingham was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Charles Christner of West Newton and sent to Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $10,000 cash bond. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for March 24 in front of Christner.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.