Coke plant worker injured on the job
An employee at the ArcelorMittal coke plant in Monessen suffered injuries in a weekend accident at the plant, a company spokeswoman confirmed Wednesday.
The man was injured on Saturday. The company would not provide any other details about the accident, including the man's identity, the type of accident or how he suffered the injuries.
“We understand that the employee's injuries are not life threatening, and we are hopeful for a quick and complete recovery,” Mary Beth Holdford, Manager of External Communications for ArcelorMittal, wrote in a statement Wednesday evening. “A joint safety investigation was immediately initiated.”
Both Monessen police Chief John Mandarino and Municipal Fire Chief Chris Rhome said their departments were not notified of any accident at the plant.
When contacted Wednesday afternoon, Scott Wolfe, safety manager at the Monessen site, confirmed the accident but referred further questions to plant manager Paul Champagne.
A secretary for Champagne, referred all questions to Holdford.
Holdford confirmed the Monessen plant is “planning for a restart of its coke battery operations this week.”
The plant has been on “hot idle” status since the ArcelorMittal ceased operations in May 2009, citing difficult economic conditions.
The company spent approximately $50 million in “modernization” renovations and improvements following a September 2012 announcement that the plant would be processing coke again by May of this year.
The plant will employ approximately 156 workers, Holdford said.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.