Elizabeth woman faces drug charges
An Elizabeth woman is accused of transporting cocaine – held for her by a 9-year-old girl – when her truck was stopped Monday in New Eagle.
Cheryl Campbell, 50, of 723 Ninth St. is charged with three counts each of possession of a controlled substance and endangering the welfare of children, two counts of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, one count of drug paraphernalia and several traffic violations.
She was arranged before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson and placed in the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $50,000 straight cash bond.
The single-seat pickup truck driven by Campbell was carrying five people, including girls ages 9, 12 and 15, when it was stopped 10 a.m. Monday at the 7-Eleven store on 468 Main St.
Officer Ryan Lenzi said he and Officer Bill Fusco recognized an occupant in the vehicle as someone who had previously faced drug charges.
The officers watched the vehicle drive through New Eagle and make a turn into the 7-Eleven without properly using a turn signal.
Police observed four people jammed in front and the 9-year-old girl sitting on the floor, holding a purple Crown Royal whisky bag.
Police opened the bag and found a wad of cash and two plastic bags with suspected powder cocaine. Her preliminary hearing is scheduled 10 a.m. June 19 before Wilson.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.