Coal Center woman charged with DUI after fiery crash
A Coal Center woman who was rescued from her wrecked car seconds before it caught fire was drunk the night of the crash, police said.
Renee R. Geho, 49, of 7 DeBlassio Drive, was charged by California police with DUI-highest rate, DUI-general impairment (first offense), two counts of criminal mischief and driving an unregistered vehicle.
Officer Alyssa Haines filed the charges at the office of Magisterial District Judge Joshua Kanalis in Centerville. Geho will be sent them via postal summons, according to court records. She faces a preliminary hearing before Kanalis 4 p.m. July 15.
Geho's charges stem from an early morning June 4 crash on Dally Road in Long Branch. Police said Geho was driving on Dally Road when she lost control on a sharp bend and her vehicle hit the utility pole and retaining wall of a residence near Chestnut Street.
Jeremy Berish heard the crash from his Dally Road residence at 1:17 a.m. and pulled Geho out of the wreckage seconds before the car was engulfed in flames.
Haines and Charleroi Regional Police Officer Bill Gardner arrived moments later, saw Geho lying unconscious next to the car and moved her further away from the burning car and live utility wires.
Berish told police Geho was “conscious but not coherent,” when he arrived. He said her car went “straight through” the pole.
Geho was treated at Monongahela Valley Hospital in Carroll Township.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-684-2640 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.