Carroll Township man faces drug charges following traffic stop
A Carroll Township man is accused of possessing 55 stamp bags of suspected heroin in his jeans and his car.
Daryl Demchak, 46, of 142 Wisebecker Lane, was arrested following a traffic stop 2:25 p.m. Tuesday on Gearing Road in Carroll Township.
Officer Ryan Lenzi said he observed Demchak driving near the intersection of Route 88 and Ginger Hill Road.
Lenzi said he knew Demchak had been charged several times with driving without a license, DUI-related.
Lenzi said Demchak had one knife in a sheath and another clipped to his pants.
Demchak admitted to having two hypodermic needles in his pants, Lenzi said.
The officer said Demchak had five bundles containing 45 stamp bags of heroin, marked “Blue Print” in his pants.
Lenzi said that inside the car, he found another bundle containing 10 stamp bags of suspected heroin in a hollowed-out cigarette pack.
Demchak admitted to consuming alcoholic beverages while in the vehicle, Lenzi said.
Demchak was taken to the Westmoreland County Prison in Hempfield Township because of outstanding warrants in that county.
Carroll Township police charged Demchak with six counts each of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance, four counts of possession of drug paraphernalia and one count each of driving while operating privilege suspended, DUI-related, and restrictions on alcoholic beverages.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.