ShareThis Page

Charleroi woman gets jail for check scam

| Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 12:16 a.m.
Wanetta Scagline

A Charleroi woman will spend at least six months in jail for tapping into the borough water authority's bank account to pay personal cell phone and cable bills.

Wanetta Scagline, 54, of 916 McKean Ave. also pleaded guilty in Washington County Court to taking an employee's paycheck from the mailbox at the Presbyterian Church of Charleroi last year.

Scagline pleaded guilty July 1 to charges of theft and conspiracy in each incident before Judge Gary Gilman.

On June 11, Charleroi Regional Police accused Scagline, and her daughter, Samantha D. Scagline, 22, of accessing the Authority of the Borough of Charleroi's bank account by using information from a $1.55 authority refund check.

An authority employee contacted police May 20 after discovering several unauthorized transactions on the agency's account at Charleroi Federal Savings Bank.

Police said the Scaglines used false names in some cases when accessing the agency's account April 1 and 4 to pay $54 to Cricket and $163.27 to AT&T. Payments were also made to Comcast, police said.

Police said Samantha Scagline received the refund check Feb. 5, 2007.

Under questioning at the police station June 4, Wanetta Scagline initially denied involvement in the scam. After police showed her copies of the bills that were paid, she admitted she and her daughter used account numbers from the refund check to pay them, the complaint states.

Gilman sentenced Wanetta Scagline to six months to 23 months in the Washington County Correctional Facility and ordered her to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation.

After the sentencing hearing, Gilman released Scagline from jail and ordered her to return to the facility no later than 4 p.m. July 3.

As of late Tuesday, Scagline had yet to report to jail.

Samantha Scagline was scheduled to appear before Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi on Monday for a preliminary hearing on charges of criminal conspiracy and theft by unlawful taking or disposition.

Hopkins said he dismissed the charges after learning her mother had pleaded guilty and took full responsibility for the scam.

In a separate case, Wanetta Scagline pleaded guilty July 1 to theft for taking Presbyterian Church of Charleroi employee David Koschalk's paycheck Oct. 29.

Gilman sentenced her to six to 23 months in jail in that case and ordered her to pay restitution to the church.

The sentences in the two theft cases will run simultaneously.

Co-defendant Barbara J. Davis, 38, of Charleroi pleaded guilty Dec. 24 to receiving stolen property for signing and cashing Koschalk's $335.55 check. Davis was sentenced to 18 months probation.

Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-684-2640 or at swolford@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.