Monongahela man gets jail for sex assaults
A Monongahela man agreed to a plea bargain that includes jail time for sexually assaulting two young girls at his home.
Ronald L. Gray, 48, whose last known address was on Hudson Street, pleaded guilty to two counts each of aggravated indecent assault, indecent assault of a person under the age of 13 and corruption of minors. He was sentenced to serve between six and 12 years in jail and five years probation. Sentencing occurred June 26 before Washington County Common Pleas Judge Valarie Costanzo.
The assaults occurred at various times between January and December 2012.
Washington County Assistant District Attorney Traci McDonald said the decision to reach a plea agreement rather than go to trial was “victim based.”
“The girls had come so far and the family wanted to avoid them having to relive it,” McDonald said.
The victims' grandmother told authorities her wish was that Gray be listed as a sex offender under Megan's Law and that he do some jail time for his crimes.
As a part of his sentencing, Gray will be required to register with Megan's Law.
“The girls were consistent with their stories from the first time they talked to police, through their forensic interviews to the day he took his plea,” McDonald said.
The two victims were 5 and 9 years old at the time of the assaults.
Gray allegedly told the two victims not to tell authorities about the assaults.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.