Woman charged for role in Charleroi bar fight
A Carroll Township woman is accused of getting into a fight with a Charleroi bartender and breaking her finger.
Janet M. Hamilton, 43, of 1334 Country Club Road, is charged with simple assault, harassment and disorderly conduct for the June 29 incident at the Russian Club.
Charleroi Regional Police were called to the club at 1024 McKean Ave., shortly after 10 p.m. for an assault on bartender Amy Williams.
Williams told police when Hamilton came to the bar, she told her she would serve her as long as Hamilton didn't “start any trouble,” according to the criminaal complaint filed at the office of Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi.
Hamilton is the ex-girlfriend of Williams' boyfriend, Jim Durinsky, the complaint states.
Williams told police she grabbed Hamilton's beers off the bar and told her to leave after she allegedly started to “act up,” police said.
That's when Hamilton alllegedly got up and smacked Williams in the left arm.
The women started fighting on the floor, and at some point Williams suffered a broken finger.
After the fight was broken up, Hamilton allegedly left the bar.
Witnesses Jim Durinsky and Chelsea Durinsky both told police Hamilton allegedly came in the bar “drunk,” and smacked Williams, triggering the fight, police said.
Mon Valley Emergency Medical Services personnel told Williams to go to a hospital to get treatment for her broken finger.
Hamilton was sent the charges via postal summons.
She faces a hearing before Hopkins 9 a.m. July 31.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-684-2640 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.