Kronemer to face trial on charges from building fire
A Charleroi man is accused of causing a February fire at a downtown business will stand trial on charges stemming from a February fire.
Jacob Kronemer, 40, of 606 Fallowfield Ave., Apt. 1, had charges of risking a catastrophe, tampering with/fabricating evidence, disorderly conduct and scattering rubbish withdrawn Thursday.
He waived his right to a hearing before Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi on charges of criminal mischief, and possession of drug paraphernalia for the Feb. 14 fire.
Charleroi Regional Police charged him after going to his apartment for a separate case. Police allegedly saw Kronemer empty an ashtray out the window, according to the criminal complaint. Police then saw smoke coming from a large pile of garbage directly below. Police also allegedly found empty heroin stamp bags on the outside window sill where Kronemer was allegedly throwing out items, the complaint states. Another empty stamp bag was allegedly found in his residence later that night, police said.
Hopkins reduced Kronemer's bond from $50,000 to $10,000. As of late Thursday, he remained in the Washington County Correctional Facility.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-68402640 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.