Charleroi man has charges withdrawn
A Charleroi man accused of shooting up heroin with a 15-year-old girl in the borough had the most serious charges against him withdrawn.
William Dietz, 20, of 1221 Lookout Ave., Charleroi, had charges of corruption of minors and possession of a controlled substance withdrawn. He waived his right to a hearing on a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia Thursday before Magisterial District Larry Hopkins in Charleroi.
Dietz was arrested 2:37 a.m. July 1 sitting in a car with the girl in the Sunoco parking lot at 100 First St. Charleroi Regional Police got an anonymous call about two people allegedly using drugs inside a car at the gas station.
When Officer Michael Leasure approached the car, he allegedly saw a girl in the back seat putting a hypodermic needle in a black pouch, according to the criminal complaint filed Tuesday at Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins' office in Charleroi. Police said they knew the girl's name and allegedly saw a fresh needle mark on her arm.
At the police station, Dietz allegedly said that under the terms of his probation, he is not permitted to be around any female under age 18. Police said Dietz is a registered sex offender on the Megan's Law list.
Dietz was sentenced Nov. 4, 2013, in Washington County Court to 12 months' probation for corruption of minors for a Nov. 5, 2012, incident in Charleroi.
Hopkins lowered his bond from $50,000 straight to unsecured. As of late Thursday, Dietz was still in the Washington County Correctional Facility.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-68402640 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.