Traffic pattern changed at Rostraver intersection
The state knows what it will take to ultimately make the dangerous intersection of Vernon Drive and state Route 51 safer.
But for now, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation cannot afford that roundly sought solution – a new traffic light.
Rostraver Township Commissioner Pat Egros said PennDOT officials recently told him there is no money in the current 12-year plan to install a traffic signal at the intersection. Although the state gave no cost estimate for a signal, Egros estimated the price at roughly $300,000.
In May – calling for improvements to the intersection – resident Janet Erdely brought the commissioners a 17-page petition containing more than 300 signatures.
At the time, Erdely said drivers routinely make U-turns at the intersection and claimed speeding is a frequent problem. She said it is difficult to turn off Vernon Drive to head south on Route 51.
The township turned the petition over to PennDOT and requested a traffic study to identify a solution.
In a letter to the township this week, PennDOT officials indicated their study reviewed accident history at the intersection from 2009 through 2013. All of the accidents involved vehicles attempting left turns out of Vernon Drive and colliding with northbound vehicles on Route 51.
PennDOT determined that drivers are not waiting for appropriate gaps in traffic to make turns.
As a result of the study, PennDOT will, within 30 days, install a “no left turn” sign on Vernon Drive at the entrance to Route 51.
In addition, Egros said, the state will “make a physical change,” such as building an island, to force traffic to turn right from Vernon Drive.
The township provided PennDOT with statistics indicating there have been 25 reportable accidents, including one fatality, at the intersection.
Under the PennDOT recommendation, motorists will be forced to turn right from Vernon Drive onto Route 51, turn onto Route 201, and re-enter Route 51 at the ramp near Sweeney's Steakhouse. The new traffic pattern will be 1.75 miles long, Egros said.
“I'm a little disappointed that the money is not available for a traffic signal,” Egros said.
Egros said the township has contacted the Westmoreland County commissioners and state Rep. R. Ted Harhai, D-Monessen, to seek support for a traffic signal.
“We still have a lot of people helping us trying to get that light in,” Egros said. “We're still going to proceed forward.”
Harhai said the “no left turn” decision is “the first step to save lives.”
“At least we have a temporary fix,” Harhai said. “There has always been need for a light. I have always wanted a light, but the funding has not been there.”
Harhai acknowledged that the intersection is dangerous.
“The ideal situation would be to put a traffic light there. That's what I'm going to fight for going forward,” he said.
Harhai said the township might not have to wait until the 12-year plan is renewed in 2016.
“It may come sooner than later,” Harhai said. “That's an issue to fight for, and I'll be in the front line fighting for it.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.