North Charleroi man waives hearing on porn charges
A North Charleroi man will stand trial after being accused of downloading child pornography onto his cellphone.
Cody Alan Gadd, 21, of 909 Fourth Street Ext., waived his right to a preliminary hearing on 10 counts of child pornography and one count of criminal use of a communication facility. He appeared Monday for a preliminary hearing before Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi.
Gadd was arrested June 17 by agents from the state Attorney General's office. Charleroi Regional police assisted during the arrest.
An investigation found Gadd allegedly used the file sharing Dropbox application on his cellphone to download nearly three dozen pornographic images or videos containing children under the age of 18, starting in January, according to the criminal complaint.
Gadd allegedly admitted he had been looking at images and videos of kids appearing to be 17 years of age, and as he began to collect and trade files, he began viewing images of children as young as toddlers, according to court documents.
The investigation began in April, when the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children notified the attorney general's office that a report initiated by Dropbox.com showed an account was flagged for uploading several media files in January.
The account had a user name of “Cody G” and an email address belonging to Gadd. The agents obtained a court order regarding the Internet Protocol, or IP, address used with the Dropbox account used for the pornographic downloads. The IP address came back to Bentleyville Lanes, 1220 Main St., Bentleyville, where Gadd is a former employee.
Gadd was released June 19 from the Washington County Correctional Facility after posting $50,000 bond.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.