More charges filed against Monessen marijuana growers
Additional charges were filed Friday against two brothers allegedly involved in a large-scale marijuana-growing operation in Monessen.
Gregg Andrew Tchirkow, 35, of 642 Knox Ave., Monessen, and Stephen Christopher Tchirkow, 32, of 278 Murrays Lane, Pittsburgh, were both charged with manufacture, possession with intent to manufacture of deliver a controlled substance, person not to deliver firearms, possess with intent to deliver drug paraphernalia and possession of drug paraphernalia.
They are currently lodged in the Westmoreland County Jail, where they were taken following their arrests Thursday.
They were both charged with aggravated assault Thursday.
City police responded to a report of a man shot in the area of Sixth Street and Knox Avenue just before 3 a.m. Thursday. Before police arrived, they received a report that the shooting victim was running away from his attacker.
Police located Gregg Tchirkow, who had a bullet wound to his hand.
Tchirkow told police his brother, Stephen Tchirkow, shot him at 462 Knox Ave. It was at that Knox Avenue residence where police said they found throughout the house about 150 marijuana plants valued at roughly $300,000.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.