New Eagle man accused of growing marijuana plants
A New Eagle man is accused of growing marijuana plants in the basement of his home to “use at a later date.”
Anthony Jerry Pieczynski, 21, of 163 First Ave., was charged Monday with manufacture of a controlled substance and possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia.
He was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson in Monongahela and sent to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $5,000 straight cash bond.
According to the affidavit of probable cause, Monongahela police officers Ryan Waggoner. William Fusco and Kevin Harris and Chief Brian Tempest along with Carroll Township police Chief Paul Brand served a warrant at Pieczynski's home 9:30 a.m. Monday.
In a makeshift bedroom – located in the basement of the home – police allegedly found 10 suspected marijuana plants. The plants were either potted in dirt or in smaller cups with grow lights and fertilizer, according to the affidavit.
Police also said they found a digital scale, additional growing containers and a film container with seeds and glass smoking devices were discovered.
According to the affidavit, Pieczynski told police he was the owner of the marijuana plants and that he was growing them to cultivate and “use at a later date.”
Police said among the items found in the suspect's home was a calendar marked with days to harvest the plants.
A field test was conducted on the plants, which tested positive for marijuana.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.