Donora woman picked up on drug charges
A Donora woman allegedly told police her drug supplier told her to hide several bags of suspected heroin inside her body.
Monessen police arrested Miriam Kinds, 37, of 732 Thompson Ave., about 7:35 a.m. Tuesday after she was allegedly seen carrying cash going into a house in the 1000 block of Rostraver Street. The area is known for high drug activity, according to the criminal complaint.
Police stopped Kinds as she was allegedly leaving the house. She reportedly told police she was visiting her new boyfriend. Kinds then allegedly gave them permission to search her and her purse, but police found nothing, the complaint states. The alleged boyfriend has not been charged.
Kinds was taken to the police station where she allegedly admitted she bought one bag of heroin from her boyfriend. She said the man told her to put the suspected drugs in her body cavity because “people have been caught buying drugs there,” according to the complaint.
A female officer searched Kinds and found four packets of suspected heroin inside her body cavity.
Kinds is charged with possession of a controlled substance and use/possession of drug paraphernalia.
Kinds was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso in Monessen and released on $5,000 unsecured bond.
She faces a preliminary hearing before Dalfonso 9 a.m. Sept. 5.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-684-2640 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.