ShareThis Page

Retail theft suspect takes off, leaves baby at Rostraver Township Walmart

| Saturday, Aug. 30, 2014, 1:01 p.m.
Djuana Tansmore

A Monessen woman is accused of abandoning her 1-year-old niece in an effort to avoid arrest during a scuffle with store security Thursday at Walmart in Rostraver Township.

Djuna M. Tansmore, 48, of 927 McMahon Ave., was charged with retail theft, recklessly endangering another person, use/possession of drug paraphernalia and endangering the welfare of children.

The alleged incident occurred just before 1 p.m.

According to Rostraver Township police, Tansmore was seen on store surveillance video attempting to exit the store with laundry detergent and Miracle Whip.

Police said she had five containers valued at $86.58 when she attempted to leave the store while pushing a grocery cart. Her infant niece was strapped into the cart with a safety belt.

When Tansmore was approached by the store's loss prevention officer, she struggled to remove the child from the cart while the infant was still strapped in.

The struggle caused the cart to tip “in an unsafe position,” according to the police report.

Tansmore fled from the store but was later arrested near her home in Monessen, police reported. The child was released to the custody of her mother.

Tansmore was arraigned before Bradenville-based Magisterial District Judge Magisterial District Judge Mark J. Bilik and placed in the Westmoreland County Prison in Hempfield Township after failing to post $10,000 bond.

A preliminary hearing is schedule for 10 a.m. Friday before Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso in Monessen.

The manager on duty Friday night said it was his first night back on the job after being off.

He said the store's loss prevention officer was not available for comment Friday night.

Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or cbuckley@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.