Moon woman charged with child pornography, sexual abuse of children
By Adam Brandolph
Published: Monday, Sept. 17, 2012, 12:16 p.m.
Authorities on Monday arrested a Moon woman for possessing child pornography as part of an undercover investigation by the state Attorney General's Office.
Pamela Smallis, 49, is charged with 68 counts of sexual abuse of children, 16 counts of unlawful contact with a minor, five counts of sexual exploitation of children, five counts of endangering the welfare of children, five counts of corruption of minors, and one count of criminal use of a communication facility.
Attorney General Linda Kelly said Smallis was initially the subject of an investigation into the alleged distribution of illegal narcotics and prescription medications to minors, but following Smallis' April arrest the attorney general's Computer Forensics Unit examined the memory card of her cell phone and discovered 33 pictures and two videos depicting nude minors and minors engaged in sexual activity.
Smallis is being held at the Allegheny County Jail on $50,000 bail. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Sept. 25 before Coraopolis District Judge Mary Murray.
Police did not release further information.
Anyone with additional information is encouraged to contact the Attorney General's Office at 412-565-2192.
Adam Brandolph is a reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.