Chestnut Ridge Lions Club honors top 6th-graders
At graduation time, the Chestnut Ridge Lions Club continued a 53-year tradition of honoring the top sixth-grade students at Donegal Elementary School.
“We like to encourage young people to make the most of themselves especially through scholarship and learning,” said Lions Awards Co-Chairman John Proper of Donegal Township.
This year's recipients were Matthew Achtziger in first place, Evan Tinkey in second place and Jordyn Bradley in third place.
The club relied on teachers at the school to provide them with the names of the students, said the Rev. Keith Deckinger of Donegal Borough, who serves as Lions Awards co-chairman with Proper.
“Scholarship is very important, but it's not everything. Neatness, participation and civic awareness and service were also very important,” Proper said.
Deckinger said the third-place winner received $10, the student earning second place, $15, and the top student received $25 and had his name placed on a plaque displayed in the school.
“We started 53 years ago with one plaque and we now have three plaques hanging on the wall in the school, and now we have three on the wall with more than 53 names because a couple years there was a tie,” Proper said.
Achtziger of Mt. Pleasant Township said he had a 4.0 grade point average upon graduation. In addition to his scholastics, he said he hunts and collects historical memorabilia.
“I appreciated the recognition for my efforts in school. I am particularly proud of my name being on the plaque. My uncle's name is also on the plaque,” he said.
Linda Harkcom is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.