Mt. Pleasant adds 23 new pedestrian crosswalk placards
Mt. Pleasant Borough Police Chief Steve Ober said 23 new pedestrian crossing signs were recently placed at various locations in the borough to improve safety for area residents.
The signs were obtained at no cost to the borough from PennDOT to alert motorists of the possibility of pedestrians crossing the street, Ober said.
Ober completed an application requesting the signs for high traffic pedestrian areas in the borough, he said.
The signs were added to the 24 existing crosswalk markers, Ober said.
Ober said the signs were placed at intersections that are not equipped with traffic lights.
The new bright yellow markers were placed at the following locations: Spring Street at Eagle Street, Quarry Street at Main Street, Church Street at Eagle Street, Hitchman Street at Main Street, Quarry Street at Kraisinger's Market and along Church Street near Frick Park.
PennDOT Safety Officer Jay Ofsanik said the channeling devices are to serve as a visual reminder to motorists to yield to pedestrians at the designated areas. The heavy bases keep the devices in place and require no maintenance, added Ofsanik.
He said PennDOT spent $1.3 million to enhance pedestrian safety and has placed more than 800 devices in municipalities in the region.
Kraisinger's Market owner Regis Kraisinger said he is excited to have them in front of his store.
He received three signs at crosswalk areas in front of his business, which was more than he expected.
He mentioned the need for the signs has been a concern for quite a while.
“I am happy to have them, especially since most of my patrons are senior citizens,” Kraisinger said. “I think it gives older patrons a sense of security.”
Kelly Vernon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-547-5722 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.