Mt. Pleasant Area's Liprando, Toohey nominated for Driscoll awards
Mt. Pleasant Area Junior-Senior High School principal Ken Williams and district athletic director David Capozzi have nominated two senior athletes for the 58th annual Judge John J. Driscoll Excellence Awards — seniors Luke Liprando and Jordan Toohey.
Driscoll, a Westmoreland County Juvenile Court judge, the county's 18 athletic directors and the Driscoll committee, reviewed this year's candidates recently and voted on the 12 finalists, as well as the male and female winners, which will be announced at the banquet to be held at 6 p.m. Tuesday at Ferrante's Lakeview Lounge in Hempfield.
Nominees must participate in one varsity sport, maintain a grade point average of 3.5 and finish in the top 20 of their graduating classes.
Toohey and Liprando are both three-sport athletes at Mt. Pleasant, and both will compete at the collegiate level come fall.
Toohey will attend St. Francis University where she will major in business and play on the women's soccer team.
“It means a lot to me to be selected, because it is rewarding me for all my hard work knowing that people notice my success,” she said. “But I wouldn't have achieved this nomination without the support of my parents, coaches and the administration for being there for me when I needed it the most.”
Liprando will attend Bucknell University where he will also major in business and will play on the school's football team.
“I feel I achieved the nomination by working hard both academically and athletically, because from a young age my parents made sure they stressed the importance of academics first and athletics second,” he said.
John Poole is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.