Mt. Pleasant Township Municipal Authority works to connect residents
The Mt. Pleasant Township Municipal Authority is taking final steps to connect the last residents to its sewage system.
Authority Chairman Charles Naggy said at the board's recent monthly meeting that 98 properties are still not connected to the new system.
“It's a DEP requirement that they must hook up,” board member Lee Speer said.
Naggy said 58 certified letters have already gone out to residents who have not connected.
“People have just been procrastinating, but there will be some that we have to take to the magistrate to get them to comply,” Naggy said.
Authority Manager Stacy Hayes said 40 more letters will go out this week.
“They are all in violation right now,” Hayes said.
In other business:
• Board members approved the hiring of Pam Albeckas to the position of office clerk with part-time hours, citing the need for more office manpower with the approaching establishment of quarterly billing for customers living in the Shupes Run area;
• The board directed solicitor Les Mlakar to prepare a proposal giving the authority coverage options for grinder pumps that are installed in the system at some properties.
Naggy also said the authority will examine electronic mapping of its sewage system.
“There have already been add-ons to the system, and I want to make sure 10 years from now we have good records of where everything is,” Naggy said.
Linda Harkcom is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.