Share This Page

Murrysville officials mull traffic-light decision

| Thursday, July 19, 2012, 9:03 a.m.

The timing might be off for Murrysville officials to overhaul the red lights along Route 22.

Officials are considering a more-than $30,000 series of studies that could change the timing of lights along Route 22 amid complaints that the lights - which are triggered by traffic cameras - aren't working properly.

Several council members have received complaints from drivers enduring prolonged waits at red lights that have no cross traffic. Officials will decide next month whether or not to complete a $9,800 comprehensive review of traffic cameras, wiring and other equipment before completing a $22,000 traffic study.

"It's of concern to us all and has become a priority," said Jim Morrison, chief administrator for the municipality. "We need to get in front of us what the issue is."

Morrison said officials have been dealing with light synchronization on Route 22 for 10 years. While installing video cameras to detect traffic at a cross street - such as Triangle Lane, where the problem regularly occurs - has helped alleviate some of the problem, more improvement is possible, he said.

The only entity with authority to change the timing of red lights is the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. However, Morrison said to make that request, the municipality must complete a $22,000 traffic study.

He said he hopes to receive a state grant to help fund the project, which could involve replacing some of the red light cameras along Route 22.

Councilman Jeff Kepler, who initially brought up the problem several months ago, said he has seen motorists frustrated with the wait simply run the red light by Triangle Lane.

"Often times, there's no one sitting there when the light turns red," Kepler said. "You'll sit for a long time and not a single car will cross."

Kepler said he would like to see the cameras replaced either with new technology or radar.

"I truly believe to fix the issue, we need to do both," he said. "Traffic is bad enough along 22. We shouldn't be adding to the problem."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.