Franklin Regional teachers, volunteer named Excellence Award winners
Two teachers and a parent volunteer will receive the Franklin Regional School District's highest honor next month.
Officials announced Monday the recipients of the district's annual Excellence Awards. This year's winners are Chris Cooley, a middle school teacher; Midge Shigle, a learning-support teacher at Newlonsburg Elementary; and Megan Ciaramitaro, a parent volunteer at Sloan Elementary.
“The school district is very fortunate to have these people working or volunteering for us,” school board member Paul Scheinert said.
A panel of district stakeholders — including parents, students, faculty, administrators, staff and community members — whittled the list of 40 nominees down to three, said Shelley Shaneyfelt, director of public relations.
Cooley, a seventh-grade math teacher, was honored for his work organizing Serving Other Souls, a service-based student organization that has raised more than $20,000 to help families in need.
Shigle was honored for getting “outstanding results” from her students, particularly in reading, Shaneyfelt said.
Ciaramitaro was honored for her time volunteered and impact she has made at Sloan.
The district solicits nominations for the awards from the community each January.
Recipients will be recognized at a community dinner on March 25.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.