Franklin Regional taking a pass on multiple valedictorians
Being “No. 1” will stay a solo honor for the foreseeable future at Franklin Regional.
School board members Monday rejected a proposal to allow multiple valedictorians as “Distinguished Scholars” after more than 30 minutes of debate. The plan, which was recommended by administrators, would have granted the senior class' top honor to any student with a grade-point average above 4.4.
In previous years, between eight and 12 students met that criteria and would have been named valedictorian. That didn't sit well with board members.
“One is one,” board Vice President Joe Seymour said. “It's not one through 12.”
The proposal was shot down by a 1-7 vote, with Seymour supporting the plan. Board President Herb Yingling was absent because of illness.
High School principal Ron Suvak said class rank often is determined by as little as 0.001 of a grade point.
Franklin Regional uses a weighted grade system in which students can attain more than a 4.0 grade-point average by taking honors or Advanced Placement courses. Students who receive an “A” in an honors class would receive 4.40 toward their GPA; an “A” in an Advanced Placement course would receive 4.80 points.
Board member Dennis Pavlik suggested that the real problem might be with how the district awards grades, rather than the class-rank system.
“We may be looking at the wrong animal here,” Pavlik said. “Are we giving too many A's? It seems the grades reflect the outcome we expect of the kids.”
Officials most struggled with the idea that all “Distinguished Scholars” would have a class rank of one listed on their transcript, if the student opted to include that information. Suvak said most students choose to omit that information for fear a college might reject the student for not being ranked as a valedictorian or salutatorian, despite the high GPA.
“We're putting into policy a lie then?” Seymour asked. “We're saying all 12 or seven are one by putting that ‘one' on a transcript.
“I know what ‘one' means — it doesn't mean 12.”
Board member Kim Bondi said that the teens need to accept that they aren't always going to be No. 1.
“My (16-year-old triplets) told me, ‘Life's not fair, someone has to be No. 1,'” Bondi said. “OK, that's out of the mouths of babes. This is life. There is someone who is going to be better than you sometimes.”
The proposal will be reviewed by the board's policy committee and revised before returning to the school board at a later date.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.