Man accused of selling cocaine in Murrysville
A North Versailles man was charged last month with selling cocaine and marijuana in the Murrysville area over a period of at least 15 months.
The Pennsylvania Attorney General's office charged John J. DiNapoli, Jr., 29, with two counts each of delivery of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. He is accused of delivering 131.4 grams of cocaine in Murrysville and 259.3 grams of cocaine in Bell Township.
DiNapoli also was charged with criminal use of a communication facility and two counts of delivery of a controlled substance for incidents in Bell Township.
A first controlled purchase of 4.5 ounces of cocaine was made in December in an individual in a Murrysville parking lot, according to the affadavit of probable case. DiNapoli delivered more than 7 kilograms of cocaine to the same individual between 2008 and November 2012, as well as about 10 pounds of marijuana each year, the affadavit stated. Those deliveries typically took place at a Bell Township residence and were sold throughout Westmoreland County, police said.
DiNapoli was held for court after a preliminary hearing on March 3 in front of Magisterial Judge Charles Conway. He is scheduled for a formal arraignment in Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas April 24.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.