Franklin Regional students fare better than state average in Keystone Exams
If the Keystone Exams are the future of standardized testing in Pennsylvania, the future looks bright for Franklin Regional.
The district received results this month from the first set of Keystone Exams, which were administered in December.
In all three subject areas, FR students tested higher than the state average.
• In literature, 90 percent of the 300 FR students who took the test met or exceeded state standards, compared to 66.8 percent of students statewide.
• In algebra, 71 percent of the 435 FR students met or exceeded state standards, compared to 54 percent of students statewide.
• In biology, 65 percent of the 304 FR students met or exceeded state standards, compared to 41.5 percent statewide.
The results were impressive, said Shelley Shaneyfelt, director of instruction and public relations.
“We are very proud of the efforts of our students and faculty to do their best on this exam,” Shaneyfelt said. “We are pleased that these initial results indicate that our students performed well above the state average, and we are particularly excited about the results on the literature exam.”
Beginning this year, the Keystone Exams will replace the 11th grade Pennsylvania System of School Assessment tests. Students will take the three end-of-course exams developed and paid for by the state.
State officials have proposed requiring students to test at least “proficient” on the three exams beginning with the class of 2017.
While the FR scores are impressive, Shaneyfelt said, the district can do better. Students who don't test at least “proficient” on the exams must retake the test.
Students can take a Keystone Exam after compling the course it is linked to. Biology typically is taken in ninth grade — many of the students who took the Keystone Exam in December took the class one or two years ago. With algebra — the test that most worried officials, Shaneyfelt said — most of the students who took the exam had completed the course in eighth grade and were being tested as many as three years later.
The literature test is most closely aligned with the district's curriculum, Shaneyfelt said, as students took the test less than six months after completing the course. This year, testing was administered to juniors.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.