Work to cause detours on Routes 286, 66
Beginning next week, motorists who travel Route 286 and Route 66 in Washington Township will have some extra driving to do.
Work is slated to begin April 1 on a $1.7 million replacement of the Route 286 bridge that carries traffic over Route 66. J.F. Shea Construction in Mt. Pleasant has been contracted for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation project.
During construction, eastbound traffic along Route 286 will be detoured onto Route 366 and Route 380. While the bridge is demolished and beams are installed on the new bridge, Route 66 traffic will detour onto Mamont Road.
The work will take place between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m., PennDOT officials said.
The project is expected to be completed by late September.
A second PennDOT project in the area will take place along Route 819, Athena Road and Story Road in Salem and Delmont. A 3.71-mile rails-to-trails walking and bike path will run between Slickville and Delmont.
Work on the $1.38 million project includes the clearing, shaping and grading of the trail, drainage improvements, trail paving and the construction of trail crossings. The trail will follow the former Pennsylvania Railroad, Turtle Creek Branch.
Work is expected to be completed by June 24. Motorists should watch for construction vehicles accessing the trails during the next three months.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.