ShareThis Page

Murrysville officials to vote April 17 on road closure

| Thursday, April 4, 2013, 12:51 p.m.
Brandthoover Cutoff from Old William Penn Highway, Murrysville, on Monday, April 1.

Lillian DeDomenic | For The Murrysville Star
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Murr
Brandthoover Cutoff from Old William Penn Highway, Murrysville, on Monday, April 1. Lillian DeDomenic | For The Murrysville Star

The fate of the Branthoover Cut-Off could be decided later this month.

Murrysville Council is slated to vote on whether or not to close the road, which connects Old William Penn Highway and Route 22, at its April 17 meeting. The road was the site of a 2009 traffic accident that resulted in a lawsuit against the municipality.

Chief Administrator Jim Morrison said closing the road, which also enables eastbound Route 22 drivers to make a U-turn, was being discussed because of a “change in accident history.” Council considered closing the road in 2005 at the recommendation of municipal officials, but rejected the idea at the time because there was no significant accident history.

A discussion on closing the road was scheduled for last week's council meeting, but officials did not discuss the issue publicly. Instead, council met for about 30 minutes in an executive session with Solicitor George Kotjarapoglus for an update on the suit.

Paul and Joanne Kimelman of Churchill filed a lawsuit against the municipality in April 2012 after their Suzuki Reno was struck while they tried to turn from Branthoover Cut-Off onto Old William Penn Highway. The lawsuit alleges that the accident, which occurred in July 2009, was caused by negligence on the part of the municipality. It calls the intersection “unorthodox” and “highly confusing.”

Elliott Schuchardt, the Pittsburgh-based attorney who is representing the couple, said he would support whatever remedy municipal officials would devise. His clients have sued the municipality for negligence and allege there is an obstructed view at the intersection with Old William Penn Highway.

“One of our objectives is to get the road modified, obviously,” Schuchardt said. “Our big point is to make the road safer and to try to save lives.”

Branthoover Cut-Off was created by the state to connect Old William Penn Highway with Route 22 when the state built the new highway, Kotjarapoglus said.

If officials opt to close the road, they also would need to decide whether to formally close the road with barricades or to abandon the road. Abandoning the road would requires council to adopt an ordinance and host a public hearing. Morrison estimated that closing the road would cost about $4,000 and would require milling the asphalt, removing the guardrails and erecting new signs.

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.