Murrysville, Export combine emergency management efforts
Murrysville and Export officials want to band together in an emergency.
The two communities will join together this year to form the Murrysville Export Emergency Management Council.
“We'll have one disaster plan with MEEMA,” Export Solicitor Wes Long said. “It's a good move.”
The communities have separate emergency management agencies, despite their proximity. Murrysville surrounds Export on all sides. In many cases, officials said, fire companies for both communities respond in an emergency.
Between Murrysville and Export, there are four fire departments, one EMS service and a police department. Export has its own fire department, but relies on Murrysville's Medic One for emergency medical services.
It does not have its own police department; instead, state police patrol Export.
In addition to Medic One and Murrysville police, the municipality is home to three fire departments — Sardis, Murrysville and White Valley.
“The emergency management community really believes this is in the best interest for all of us,” said Rege Synan, Murrysville Council's liaison to the municipal emergency management groups.
The emergency management council won't eliminate any of those groups, but will enable them to work together more efficiently and in a more cost-effective manner, Murrysville Council President Joan Kearns said.
“It's about time we do this,” Kearns said. “It's going to save both communities some money, which is always a good thing.”
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.