Export again struggles with salt storage
Export officials have more road salt than they know what to do with.
With snow likely out of the weather forecast until at least late autumn, the borough still is obligated to receive about 90 tons of road salt from American Rock Salt before July 31.
But with a full storage shed and a filled salt truck, officials are running out of space.
“Right now, I don't know what to do,” Council President Barry Delissio said.
“We can probably get (some) more in there, but we would need a larger machine to push it in.”
Export was obligated to buy at least 150 tons of road salt from American Rock Salt.
Delissio said the borough didn't start buying salt under this year's contract until February — records show the borough had about 50 tons left from last year's mild winter.
At that time, American Rock Salt extended the time that communities had to pick up their salt supply until fall.
Despite an offer from Murrysville officials last year, Export stored its excess rock salt in the borough park pavilion after its annual Light Up Export Night.
Delissio said he hopes to work out an agreement for Murrysville to store some of the salt.
Bob Bell, public works director for Murrysville, said Export hasn't been in touch about storing any salt.
Bell said Murrysville isn't encountering the same problem — the municipality is 34 square miles, compared to the smaller borough it surrounds.
Export Solicitor Wes Long said the borough should consider selling some of the salt to Murrysville, since this is the second consecutive year it has been inundated with salt.
Delissio suggested renegotiating the salt contract to require the borough to buy less salt in the future.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.