Export adds historic designation to 'fan house'
Buried in the woods adjacent to the new district justice office lies one of Export's historic gems.
It might look like a wall of cement block, but the gray, crumbling structure was used for decades to circulate fresh air underground to miners.
Soon, history buffs looking around the small town will be able to find and access the historic “fan house.” Last week, borough officials and volunteers erected a marker on the structure to designate it of historical significance. Officials hope an Eagle Scout candidate will choose to beautify the area and make it more inviting to visitors for his service project.
“We're working to make Export a better place that is more well-known for what's going on here,” Councilman John Nagoda said.
Councilwoman Melanie Litz said there are at least 10 locations throughout the borough that the historical committee would like to mark as significant. Several, such as the fan house, are tied to Export's mining history.
The fan house was used 75 to 80 years ago to bring fresh air into the coal mines over which Export is built, Nagoda said. He called the building a “lifeline” for workers.
Mayor Michael Calder said designating historically significant landmarks throughout the borough is the latest effort that officials have come together to work on.
“It's a great day,” Calder said. “Every time I turn around, another project is getting finished. This is what happens when people work together.”
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.