ShareThis Page

Franklin Regional School Board candidates puzzled by questions at event

| Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

A recent “Meet the Candidate” night sponsored by a local group left several Franklin Regional School Board primary candidates scratching their heads at some of the questions asked.

The Murrysville Area 912 Group, a loosely formed group consisting primarily of senior citizens, posed a series of nine questions to candidates; however, participants said three had little to do with serving on the board.

Candidates were asked about their stances on abortion; the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which involves weapon rights; and whether they thought the Constitution was the “law of the land” or a “living document.”

“I do not feel the questions were a true indicator of my ability to serve as a school board member; they have no bearing on our school district,” incumbent school board candidate Kimberly Bondi said. “I'm not quite sure why they were asking them.”

The reason, said, group facilitator Linda Dupill, is curiosity. The group asks those questions of any candidate running for any office, she said, and she agreed the questions don't pertain to serving on school board.

“We made it clear that these three questions are not related to school-board issues. We ask them of any candidate running for office — and they all have the option of not answering the questions.”

She described the trio of questions as “quickie questions” and said they took up very little time. She said she wishes people would focus on the issues addressed rather than three background questions.

Candidate Susan Ilgenfritz said she didn't have a problem with the questions. The one regarding the Constitution was relevant to school board because the 10th amendment “protects our rights to educate our children locally,” she said.

“What we need to remember is when you run for public office, you open yourself up to all kinds of questions from the public,” Ilgenfritz said. “What is important to one voter may not be important to others.”

Candidate George Harding called the questions “unusual,” and current board member Dennis Irvine said they left him “scratching his head” at their relevance.

“For a school board candidate, that's your moral or religious upbringing,” Irvine said. “That doesn't address if you're eligible or qualified for office.”

Current board member Paul Scheinert said the questions didn't have any bearing on the race but that he “didn't mind answering them.”

Candidate Jeremy Samek said he understood why the questions were asked.

“School boards aren't going to overturn Roe v. Wade (a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving abortion rights), but I don't have a problem answering a question about it,” Samek said.

Two candidates, Bobbi Watt-Geer and Gregg Neavin, did not attend the meeting and did not weigh in on the topics. Bondi did not attend the meeting and chose not to answer the questions.

“One of the things I learned as a school board member is that it shouldn't be political,” Bondi said. “We should be very balanced in our approach. If you have an agenda, you shouldn't be doing this.”

All of the candidates are cross-filed for the May 21 primary for both Democratic and Republican nominations for seats on the school board. Four board seats are up for election.

According to its website, the Murrysville Area 912 Group is part of The 9/12 Project, which is “dedicated to bringing people together who share similar views about the Constitution, nine core principles and 12 values, which we will hold true.” The 9/12 Project has hundreds of groups throughout the United States, including 12 in Pennsylvania. Similar groups meet in Monroeville and Irwin, according to The 9/12 Project website.

The local group's mission is to educate, communicate, be visible, know candidates, act with respect and restraint, be committed, network and support group and community, according to its site.

Dupill said the group didn't have to open the forum to the community but wanted to offer the opportunity to hear from the candidates to everyone.

“I (offered the forum) because I care — about education, about the community,” Dupill said. “We're tired of going to the polls and going, ‘eenie meenie miney moe.' We want to know who the candidates are. That's important to us.”

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.