Franklin Regional board meetings could be televised by fall
The Franklin Regional School Board could be live on television as early as this fall.
Planned upgrades to the video-production equipment at the high school would enable the district to televise its bimonthly board meetings on Channel 19, the local public-access cable channel.
“There's a potential to do something like (televising meetings),” said Brad Schrecengost, supervisor of technology for the district.
But staffing is the issue, officials said. Getting students to volunteer to staff the meetings, which begin at 7:30 p.m. on the first and third Monday of each month and can last two to three hours each would be difficult, officials said.
Community members and school board members alike have asked about televising the meetings for the past several years. Officials have said the move was cost-prohibitive and cited the lack of compatible equipment. Murrysville, which airs its council and some committee meetings on Channel 19, has compatible equipment built into the municipal building.
Schrecengost said that a portable TV studio was planned for the 2011-12 school year but was deferred a year. The $50,000 project, slated to be completed this summer, will enable students to broadcast from anywhere on the campus.
Several board members were happy to hear that such a project could lay the groundwork for televising meetings.
“If the costs become less, maybe this can happen,” board member Paul Scheinert said.
by Daveen Rae Kurutz
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Paterno son, another ex-football assistant coach suing PSU
- Wolf says he’ll work with state legislature to deal with pension woes
- College football notebook: Date moved up for Pitt-Penn State game
- Mt. Lebanon lineman Hoffman commits to Penn
- Pittsburgh officer honored for saving baby’s life
- ‘Slenderman’ attack victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous well wisher
- Expansion helps drive FNB profit higher
- Former Heinz Endowments director to head Allegheny County Parks Foundation
- Federal appeals courts disagree on Obamacare subsidies
- Lights, action, graffiti: Pittsburgh stands in for NYC in ‘Southpaw’
- Allegheny County warns of uptick in Lyme disease cases