Lack of on-the-job injuries pays big dividends for Murrysville
Murrysville's pocketbook has gotten a little richer over the past few months.
The municipality last month received more than $89,000 in dividends from its worker's compensation insurance. It also received a 44-percent reduction in its policy premium because of a low number of claims.
“The credit for this goes to all employes,” chief administrator Jim Morrison said. “Our departments do good work and have good safety habits.”
Both the policy savings and the dividends will be deposited in the general fund and can be used for any project the municipality undertakes, Morrison said. The money hasn't been earmarked for any individual project, he said.
Murrysville also filed paperwork last month on how it will use the $58,000 the municipality received under Act 13, the state legislation that levies fees on unconventional well drillers. Each community throughout the state that agreed to participate in the legislation receives an annual cut of the fees collected by drillers. The distribution is determined by the number of wells in a community or its proximity to drilling.
Morrison said the money can only be used for certain projects, including road or sewer projects. It has been placed in the municipal reserve fund. At the end of 2012, that fund contained about $12.4 million.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.