Former Export mayor beats incumbent for Democratic nomination
The former Export mayor has won a chance to fight for his old position.
Bob Campagna received the Democratic nomination for Export Mayor Tuesday night, edging incumbent Mayor Michael Calder for the party nomination by five votes. Only 95 Democrats cast ballots in the race.
But the race isn't over yet. Calder received 18 write-in votes from Republicans, and if at least 10 are certified, he will appear as the Republican candidate in the Nov. 5 election.
Campagna has served as borough mayor twice before – in the 1980s and from 2002 until Calder unseated him in 2010. He also served on council for two years in the 1980s.
Campagna's last term as mayor was a contentious one. He clashed with council over the idea of providing police protection in the borough — it is patrolled by state police – and the handling of the trust left to the borough by businessman Joseph “Junior” Hall.
Tempers flared over Campagna's promise to pay members of the Export Volunteer Fire Department for work completed in the borough after a 2009 flood.
If elected in November, Campagna said he will make sure to take voter concerns to heart.
“I want to thank all of my supporters who came out tonight,” Campagna said. “When I was out campaigning, I listened to a lot of people's concerns. They want to be heard. They want those concerns to be addressed.”
Calder did not return calls seeking comment Tuesday night.
Four years ago, Calder received nearly double the amount of votes than Campagna, as 162 votes were cast in the 2009 Democratic primary. At the time, Campagna received 53 votes – three more than he received this year – to Calder's 109.
All results are unofficial until certified by the Westmoreland County Election Bureau.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.