Murrysville, Export, Delmont incumbents easily win endorsements
Some familiar faces have won party nominations to retain their seats on local councils.
Incumbents in Murrysville, Export and Delmont enjoyed strong support in Tuesday's primary election.
In Murrysville, incumbents Joan Kearns, Jeff Kepler and Dave Perry will be joined by newcomer Loren Case on the Republican ballot for council. Perry received the most votes, with 1,071.
Newcomer Teresa Gildemeister did not garner enough votes for her party's nomination, losing to Kase by six votes.
No Democrats ran for Murrysville Council. Incumbent Ron Summerhill did not seek re-election.
In Export, incumbents Barry Delissio, Melanie Litz and Stanley “Bucky” Mahinske received the Democratic nominations, along with newcomer James Mahinske. Delissio, who serves as council president, received the most votes, with 77. Incumbent Clayton Soles received the lone Republican nomination.
In Delmont, incumbent Councilmen Jim Bortz and Andrew Shissler received Republican nominations, as did newcomer Debra Jobe, who received the most votes of any candidate with 116.
Carl Boyd received 79 write-in votes to receive the final Republican nomination.
Boyd also is the only candidate to garner enough write-in votes to receive the Democratic nomination with 52. According to voter records, Boyd is 69.
Delmont Mayor Gil Sanchez was unopposed in the primary. Sanchez received 128 votes on the Republican ballot.
In Murrysville, incumbent Mayor Bob Brooks received the Republican nomination for mayor. He was unopposed as a Republican and no one sought the seat on the Democratic ballot.
All results are unofficial until certified by the Westmoreland County Bureau of Elections.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.