Franklin Regional officials prepare for Common Core standards
While Pennsylvania legislators have delayed the planned July 1 implementation of a nationwide set of educational standards, Franklin Regional officials are continuing to prepare to adhere to the Common Core State Standards.
Superintendent Jamie Piraino said the changes won't be that drastic and called the new standards comparable to the current Pennsylvania academic standards.
“The standards aren't that different from what we have now,” Piraino said. “Standard by standard, the state is committed to the concept.”
Pennsylvania is one of 45 states across the country to adopt the standards, which dictate what concepts should be mastered by students at each grade level in individual subjects. Piraino said he has received several phone calls and emails from parents concerned about the proposed changes.
Last month, Gov. Tom Corbett directed the state department of education to recommend “minor” changes to the Pennsylvania Common Core standards and Keystone Exams to address concerns from the public and legislators, said Tim Eller, spokesman for the department of education. The proposed changes involve the implementation of the standards and exams.
The rationale behind implementing the Common Core standards is to ensure that all public school students are receiving the same quality of education, Eller said.
“Academic standards and state assessments are an important component of the state's effort to ensure that Pennsylvania students are prepared to pursue postsecondary degrees or careers after graduation,” Eller said. “To give certainty to school districts and Pennsylvania teachers, the governor has asked that modified regulations be reviewed in an expedited manner by all entities involved in the regulatory review process in order to have these regulations in place as soon as possible.”
District officials across the state have been encouraged to continue planning for the implementation of the standards, Eller said. Franklin Regional officials are doing just that, Piraino said.
Piraino also assured residents and board members that Pennsylvania is not one of the nine states participating in a pilot program of inBloom data-management software. Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, inBloom is a nonprofit group providing technology services to create a data bank of student information, including past academic performance. The bank is designed to help teachers in states where the Common Core curriculum has been implemented find resources to match with their students needs. The information collected is shared with vendors, Piraino said.
Critics of that system oppose the sharing of information with vendors and worry about potential privacy issues.
Franklin Regional, like all 500 throughout Pennsylvania, supplies information to the state through he Pennsylvania Information Management System, or PIMS. The district is required to submit student information, such as name, grade, gender, economic status and race through the system.
That information is used internally, Piraino said, particularly in determining whether individual subgroups meet state standards on standardized tests.
“We do not share that information,” Piraino said.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.