State budget includes a little extra for Franklin Regional
The finalized state budget sent a little more money Franklin Regional's way late last month.
The district received $18,000 more than officials expected in state subsidies, director of finance Jon Perry said.
The district will receive $6.66 million in basic education funding, according to figures released by the state. That's about $10,000 more than earlier budget drafts had indicated, Perry said.
According to state figures, Franklin Regional received about 2.54 percent more in basic education funding than last school year, the highest increase in the county. Westmoreland County districts received 1.81 percent more in funding than last year.
Also, the district will receive $8,000 more in special education funding than the $1.72 million anticipated.
Franklin Regional did not raise the tax rate from 87.68 mills for the 2013-14 school year. Instead, officials opted to eliminate a $420,000 shortfall by using the district's uncommitted fund balance. The owner of the average home in the district, assessed at $35,000, will continue to pay about $3,070 in taxes.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.