Murrysville delays dispatch decision
Murrysville officials last week delayed a decision to transition police dispatching to the Westmoreland County 911 dispatching system.
Council July 24 voted 6-0 to table the issue until its Aug. 7 meeting.
“We're still working through things with the county,” Chief Administrator Jim Morrison said.
Police dispatching is handled by five dispatchers, two of whom are set to retire later this year. The contract for the municipal dispatchers' union expires on Dec. 31.
Morrison and Police Chief Tom Seefeld said it would be difficult for Murrysville to provide the same level of technology that the county uses for its dispatching services.
Officials have said that if the municipality moves to the countywide system, any remaining dispatchers would be offered positions as administrative assistants in the police department.
All three municipal fire departments and Medic One ambulance service are dispatched by the county, Morrison said.
There is no cost to use the countywide system; however there would be a charge to forward the existing emergency number — 724-327-2111 — to the county dispatch center. Morrison said there would be other minor transition costs. The total savings and impact on next year's budget will be evaluated this fall.
Council will next meet on Wednesday at 7 p.m. in the municipal building.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.