Share This Page

Smartphone use causes review of technology policies at Franklin Regional

| Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Five years ago, the idea of cellphones in school classrooms was virtually unheard of.

But with the development of bring-your-own-device policies across the region, smartphones no longer are banished to students' lockers. That's a challenge for teachers and officials, who want to make sure the devices enhance learning rather than distract from it.

“We have to evaluate our technology policies continuously,” Franklin Regional School District Superintendent Jamie Piraino said. “Cellphones are one piece of technology. Regardless of what the device is, we hope that the kids will be successful and engage in the learning process.”

It's a changing field, Piraino said. He has seen students who can use their smartphones to take notes and create presentations. But he wants to see them used for other things, too.

Piraino said he envisions students using cellphones to send in answers as part of a student-response system — think buzzing in with an answer in a survey.

“It's a consumption piece where they're able to gain access to information very quickly,” Piraino said.

At Plum, officials already have established firm rules for students using their smartphones in classrooms. One major one is: “No photos allowed.”

“Students are free to use them for academic purposes,” Plum technology director Chris Davis said. “But at a specific teacher's request, they have to put them away.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.