Twin Oaks landslide continues to worsen
First, it was the ground along Twin Oaks Drive and part of the road's asphalt. Now, it's the nearby trees.
Officials say a subterranean landslide that closed the Murrysville road to through traffic continues to worsen. Recently, a large tree near the slide toppled over the road, and several others in the area have become unstable.
About 130 feet of Twin Oaks Drive between Acorn Lane and Bridgewood Drive began to crumble in early April. Municipal engineer Joe Dietrick said an unstable geological formation, plus the way the road was built, contributed to the problem.
“It's definitely not done,” Dietrick said. “It's going to keep moving until it's happy.”
Dietrick said it would be cost prohibitive to try to restore the road to its preslide condition.
“It's so deep that a fix would be astronomical,” he said.
Chief administrator Jim Morrison, who attributed the slide to water washing part of the road away, said the best option for municipal officials is to convert the road into two cul-de-sacs. Officials plan to set aside $200,000 for the project over the next two years but said they don't know how much final repairs and alterations will cost.
Dietrick said he hopes that the road — which will remain closed between Acorn Lane and Bridgewood Drive — will settle enough that work can begin in 2014.
Rege Synan, Murrysville Council vice president, said there's no other option but to wait.
“Mother Nature wins sometimes.”
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.