ShareThis Page

Manor Council picks its president for rest of year

| Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

In a split vote, Manor Council chose Dawn Lynn to be its president through the end of the year.

Lynn, 48, succeeds Brian Woy, who stepped aside from the presidency in August but remains on council.

Lynn, a Republican, is in her first term on council after being elected in 2011. She also serves on the borough's planning commission.

Bruce Hartman and Steve Ira unsuccessfully backed Jim Morgan, who will remain vice president, for the position.

Because voters will choose four council members in the November election, council will decide during a January reorganization meeting who will wield the gavel next year.

Fewer '14 meetings

In 2014, council will break a long standard by having only one public meeting per month.

Council traditionally has held meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of the month except during the summer, when members would limit their business to one meeting.

Council has yet to formalize its meeting dates.

Office assistant

Council is seeking a replacement for Carla Fabac, who is resigning as the borough office assistant after four years.

Fabac's last day on the job is tomorrow, Friday.

Until a permanent replacement is chosen, council approved the hiring of a part-time employee through a temporary agency.

Council capped the pay rate at $21 an hour, which would cover taxes and any recruitment costs an agency would incur for selecting the person.

Bus service

Council agreed to continue paying a local assessment to the Westmoreland County Transit Authority to continue bus service through the borough.

During a brief discussion, officials pondered how many residents ride the buses but determined the $1,165 cost for the next year is reasonable.

Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.