Export officials OK with unpaid lot for bus riders
Export officials will continue to allow Westmoreland Transit riders to park at the borough parking lot despite the fact that the transit authority no longer pays rent for the lot.
Borough Solicitor Wes Long said he spoke with officials for the Westmoreland County Transit Authority, who indicated that the authority is “not in a position to pay money for the lot because of budgetary cutbacks.”
The borough has not had a rental agreement with the authority for the parking lot for several years. In the past, the transit authority paid Export to use the lot as part of an approximately $5,000 multiyear deal, Long said. However, portions of the lot were closed beginning in 2010, as work progressed on the Turtle Creek flood-control progress.
Prior to then, the lot wasn't well-used, Long said.
But authority officials earlier this year reported that ridership on the 2F route, which shuttles Export, Delmont and Murrysville riders to downtown Pittsburgh, increased by 35 percent in 2012. Now, use of the lot as a park-and-ride has increased dramatically, officials said.
“I guess we could chain it off and not let anyone use it and be ‘that town,' Long said. “Or we could promote mass transit and promote people stopping in our town. Park-and-ride is a good thing all around.”
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-856-7400, ext. 8627.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.