ShareThis Page

Owner withdraws zoning request for Murrysville Golf Course

| Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2013, 4:54 p.m.

The owner of Murrysville Golf Course has withdrawn a request for officials to change the zoning of the property so developers could build 84 homes on the 137-acre property.

Murrysville Chief Administrator Jim Morrison said Jim Geiger, general manager of the golf course, called Tuesday to withdraw an application to change the golf course zoning from rural-residential to “R-1,” a designation that permits low-density development.

Geiger was not available for comment Wednesday. His attorney, Bill Sittig, said Geiger and his family agreed to pull the request.

Murrysville Council last week hosted a public hearing on the rezoning, which Geiger had requested in August. At that time, developer Richard Kacin submitted an advisory document that outlined a plan to turn the golf course into an 84-home housing development. Kacin does not have a formal agreement to buy the property from Geiger.

Last week, Geiger told council that he was requesting the rezoning because surrounding areas were zoned “R-1” and he believed the property should have received that designation in 2005, when municipal officials designated it rural-residential.

But Sittig told council there was more to the situation than just fixing what property owners believed was a municipal oversight.

“One of the things that the Geiger family doesn't want to talk about is that there has been a change in the golf business,” Sittig said last week. “Obviously, nobody has gotten rich doing it. I'm here for a family telling you that they need to do this to go on.”

Sittig Wednesday said that one fact that affected his client's decision was the reaction he received from municipal officials. Council last week commented primarily on Kacin's plans to develop the land, rather than the zoning request.

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.