Murrysville budget indicates 5.6 percent increase in revenues, expenditures
There is no tax-rate increase in Murrysville's proposed 2014 budget.
The $8 million spending plan indicates thatrevenues and expenditures will increase by 5.6 percent over the 2013 budget.
In discussing the proposal at the Nov. 6 Murrysville Council meeting, chief administrator Jim Morrison and director of finance Diane Hemming said they hope to start rebuilding the municipality's funding reserves next year by moving $900,000 in revenue.
Hemming said building up the reserves would enable the municipality to handle any “unexpected” expenses.
Municipal officials are expecting a windfall of earned-income taxes next year, thanks to conservative budgeting in 2013.
When officials were developing the 2013 budget, they weren't sure how much tax income the municipality would receive in this, the first year that the county was responsible for collecting and distributing earned-income tax, Hemming said.
“We weren't confident projecting an increase,” she said.
The value of a mill in the municipality has been on a consistent upswing since 2011, according to the proposed plan. The value of a mill in 2014 is estimated at $323,000 — a 2.2 percent increase over 2013 — because of new developments and construction in the municipality.
The millage rate is expected to remain at 12.15 mills.
One uncertainty lies with a police contract that is being negotiated, Hemming said.
“We don't really know what the final outcome will be,” Hemming said.
Capital projects for 2014 include road and bridge maintenance; vehicle purchases for fire, police and public works; and signal and median improvements on Route 22.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.