Delmont likely to hold line on taxes
Delmont's budget will take a little longer than usual to approve this year because officials forgot to vote to advertise the budget in November.
Borough council will approve the proposed $1.036 million budget at a special meeting on Dec. 30.
“It's on time, but it could have been done a month ago,” Council President Jim Bortz said. “We've got a lot accomplished here, and we're still able to save money.
The proposal does not include a tax increase but has about $92,000 in undesignated funds. The borough property tax rate will remain at 18 mills, officials said. The owner of a home assessed at $25,000 — the average borough value — will continue to pay about $450 in property taxes.
Delmont residents will, however, pay a bit more in their sewage bills next year. Council agreed to raise the borough sewage rate by $4 to $45.25 per month.
The increase will help pay a nearly $1 million loan the borough obtained to complete work on the Cramer Pump Station and to build capital funds for sewage projects. Finance committee member Andrew Shissler said another sewage increase is likely in a few years to help offset some costs.
The increase is expected to generate about $60,000 annually, engineer Kevin Brett said.
Delmont has enough money left over at the end of this budget year to avoid obtaining a tax-anticipation loan to pay borough expenses at the start of 2014, Bortz said.
“This council is able to treat Delmont borough as a business, not a free enterprise that hands out money to whomever wants it,” Bortz said. “We make everybody accountable. Everybody has accepted that responsibility.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.